Beyond Grades: Why Portfolios Represent the Future of Learning

For over a century, schools have relied on grades and exams as the measure of success. A single letter or number is assumed to capture years of learning, effort, and growth. Yet research, universities, and forward-thinking educators are increasingly questioning whether exam grades tell us what really matters. We believe the future lies in portfolio-based learning: a rich, holistic way of documenting a learner’s journey, skills, and contributions.

Grades, whether A–F or 1–9, were designed for efficiency, not depth. They sort, filter, and rank students, but rarely capture what students can actually do.

Inflation and inconsistency: Even elite universities acknowledge that grades no longer differentiate as they once did. The Washington Post recently argued that rising averages have eroded their meaning, with top marks increasingly the norm rather than the exception.

Exams privilege memorisation and test-taking strategies over creativity, collaboration, and resilience. As the AACSB’s Grade Debate report put it, “grades may not measure what matters most in business or life.” The result is a system that too often rewards compliance and performance under pressure, rather than curiosity, competence, and genuine capacity.

A portfolio tells the story of a learner. Instead of reducing years of experience to two or three digits on a transcript, a portfolio brings together evidence of projects, reflections, and growth. And the research is clear: Portfolios reduce stress and foster well-being. A 2024 study of undergraduates found that portfolios significantly lowered exam-related anxiety while better preparing students for professional life. They enable continuous reflection and growth. Unlike one-off exams, portfolios make space for iterative feedback, helping learners build self-awareness and deeper understanding. They capture a wider range of skills, from problem-solving and creativity to resilience and collaboration, that traditional exams rarely touch. They strengthen employability and identity. Digital e-portfolios, now common in higher education, are increasingly valued by employers as evidence of both competence and character. Put simply, portfolios don’t just measure learning; they make learning visible.

A quiet revolution is already underway. Universities worldwide are opening “portfolio admissions” pathways: U.S. liberal arts colleges and creative programs have long valued portfolios; now the model is expanding into interdisciplinary applications. MIT, for instance, invites students to submit supplemental “Maker, Research, and Arts” portfolios alongside traditional applications. Hundreds of colleges have joined the Mastery Transcript Consortium, replacing GPAs with narrative, portfolio-style transcripts. In Europe and Asia, competency-based admissions are gaining traction, while more than 2,000 U.S. institutions are now test-optional or test-free. Even where grades remain, portfolios increasingly serve as the evidence behind the claims.

The Global Classroom is not a school and we are not an exam centre. Instead, our learners travel across Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam, engaging with place-based projects that matter. Their portfolios become living documents of growth:

Environmental Systems & Societies (ESS): biodiversity studies, conservation initiatives, and reflections on ecological ethics. Global Politics: debates on human rights, sustainability, and peace, supported by research essays and activism projects. Visual Arts: exhibitions, reflective journals, and comparative art studies.

Mathematics: climate modelling, economic analysis, and real-world mathematical investigations.

Every artifact is paired with reflection, what was attempted, what changed, what was learned. This process is what the research consistently identifies as the “engine” of portfolio effectiveness.

“But Will This Get My Child Into University?” It’s natural to worry that stepping away from exams could close doors. But the evidence says otherwise. Studies show little to no difference in college success between applicants who submitted test scores and those who didn’t. More importantly, admissions offices increasingly look for applicants who can demonstrate critical thinking, creativity, and initiative, all of which shine through in a well-curated portfolio.

We also ensure our curriculum is guided by the IB framework. This means that if a student later chooses to sit for exams, they will have the disciplinary knowledge to do so. The difference is that they will bring not only exam readiness but also a powerful body of evidence that often matters more.

Exams reward short-term performance under pressure. Portfolios reward learning that sticks. When young people can point to things they’ve built, problems they’ve solved, and communities they’ve served, they aren’t just “applicants”, they’re contributors. That is the future we are building toward.

Bibliography

AACSB International (2025). The Grade Debate: Is There a Better Path Forward? AACSB Insights. Available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/insights/articles/2025/06/the-grade-debate-is-there-a-better-path-forward

Anderson, M. (2025). Grade Inflation Is Real. Why Not Embrace It? The Washington Post, 3 March 2025. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/03/03/grade-inflation-why-not/

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Springer.

Eynon, B., Gambino, L. M., & Török, J. (2014). High-Impact ePortfolio Practice: A Catalyst for Student, Faculty, and Institutional Learning. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges & Universities.

Godwin, K. E., Almeda, M. V., Seltman, H., Kai, S., & Baker, R. S. (2016). Off-task behavior in elementary school children. Learning and Instruction, 44, 128–143.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Learning Policy Institute (2018). Performance Assessment: A Review of the Literature. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE). (2017). Defining Performance Assessment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The Educational Potential of e-Portfolios: Supporting Personal Development and Reflective Learning. London: Routledge.

Tok, H. (2024). Portfolio assessment: Reducing stress and anxiety in higher education. Language Testing in Asia, 14, 6. Available at: https://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40468-024-00296-y

Trevitt, C., Macduff, C., & Steed, A. (2021). Portfolios for professional learning and development in healthcare. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10(1), 1–6.

Watson, C., Kuh, G., Rhodes, T., Penny Light, T., & Chen, H. (2016). Editorial: ePortfolios—The Eleventh High Impact Practice. International Journal of ePortfolio, 6(2), 65–69.